Automatic Telling Machine 255, High Street, GU1 3BJ
Decided 24 May 2022 26415507 CBRE - London
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
This appeal concerned an ATM-related entry that had been stayed pending the Supreme Court's decision in Cardtronics v Sykes. Following the judgment and list maintenance exercise by the Valuation Officer, this appeal was considered redundant as multiple appeals had been lodged against the same list entry. The appellant did not appear, was not represented, and provided no evidence to support an arguable case, leading to dismissal.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was the ratepayer, unrepresented.
Grounds argued
No grounds were argued — the decision records none.
- Evidence
- None from the ratepayer
- Cases cited
- Cardtronics UK Ltd and Others v Sykes
Similar decisions
- Automatic Telling Machine 255, High Street, GU1 3BJ — Dismissed, 24 May 2022
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.