Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant did not appear or provide representation in this ATM-related appeal. Following the Supreme Court's judgment in Cardtronics v Sykes, the tribunal lifted its stay and the Valuation Officer undertook a list maintenance exercise. The VO considered this appeal redundant following discussions with interested parties, and as the appellant provided no evidence of an arguable case, the appeal was dismissed.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was the ratepayer.
Grounds argued
- Validity of the proposal
- Evidence
- None from the ratepayer
- Cases cited
- Cardtronics UK Ltd and Others v Sykes
Similar decisions
- Atm Outside Home & Bargain 34-36, Bold Street, L1 4DS — Dismissed, 24 May 2022
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.