Tribunals · Liverpool City Council

Atm Outside Home & Bargain 34-36, Bold Street, L1 4DS

Decided 24 May 2022 28833846 The Beattie Partnership

OutcomeDismissed — nobody attended for the ratepayerThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV—
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided—

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

This ATM-related appeal was stayed pending the Supreme Court's judgment in Cardtronics UK Ltd v Sykes. Following that judgment, the tribunal lifted its stay and the Valuation Officer undertook list maintenance, considering this appeal redundant following reviews and amendments of appealed entries. The appeal was dismissed as the appellant did not appear, was not represented, and provided no evidence of an arguable case.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was the ratepayer, unrepresented.

Grounds argued

No grounds were argued — the decision records none.

Evidence
None from the ratepayer
Cases cited
Cardtronics UK Ltd v Sykes

Similar decisions

All decisions in Liverpool City Council ·

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.