Tribunals · Leeds City Council · 2010 rating list

Unit 19 Kirkstall Bridge Shopping Park Bridge Road, LS5 3BL

Retail warehouse and premises Decided 22 April 2021 26903149 GL Hearn Limited

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV£148,000£195/m²
Ratepayer sought£118,000
VO conceded first£147,000−1% before the hearing
Tribunal decided£140,000£185/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant sought a reduction in base rate to £175psm with a 10% pioneering allowance, arguing Guiseley Retail Park was the better comparator to Kirkstall Bridge due to comparable shops and lack of petrol station. The tribunal found Savins Mill Way not directly comparable due to its different amenities (larger supermarket and petrol station), and accepted that proximity alone should not dictate identical base rates. The tribunal rejected the pioneering allowance argument as earlier tenants had received lease incentives including rent-free periods. The tribunal reduced the base rate to £185psm (agreed mezzanine reduction to £15psm), resulting in an RV of £140,000.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Pets at Home Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
  • Quantum or end allowance
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments, Photographs
Cases cited
Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson
Hearing
26 March 2021

Similar decisions

All decisions in Leeds City Council · Shops nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.