Tower Bridge House Floor 6, St Katharines Way, London, London, E1W 1AA
Offices and premises Decided 1 April 2021 27528733 Rabbette
Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2005 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 2 properties together and does not tie its figures clearly to this appeal, so the figures above are for the first property it lists. Every property is listed below.
The 2 properties in this decision
One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them (2005 list); this appeal’s property is highlighted.
| Property | Original RV | Sought | Tribunal decided | Outcome |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2nd Floor, Tower Bridge House, St Katharine's Way, London E1W 1AAThis appeal | £600,000 | — | — | Struck out |
| 6th Floor, Tower Bridge House, St Katharine's Way, London E1W 1AA | £605,000 | — | — | Struck out |
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant (Mazars LLP) challenged a Valuation Officer's alteration that gave effect to earlier agreed settlements by proposing a reduction in the RV from £600,000 for the 2nd floor and £605,000 for the 6th floor, with an agreed 5% end allowance to reflect city office oversupply. The tribunal found that the base rate of £250 per m² had already been judicially determined by the VTE and Upper Tribunal, and that issue estoppel applied. The tribunal also found the appeals constituted an abuse of process, as the appellant was seeking a "second bite of the cherry" by challenging agreements reached only 19 days earlier without new evidence that could not have been ascertained through due diligence.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Mazars Llp, represented.
Grounds argued
- Rental evidence
- Comparable assessments (tone)
- Change of circumstances
- Validity of the proposal · decisive
- Change of circumstances
- city office oversupply
- Evidence
- Rents, Earlier tribunal decisions, Expert report
- Cases cited
- Thorntons Plc and Clarion Solicitors Ltd [2018] UKUT 0109 (LC); Co-operative Group, Poundland and Virk (VO) and Battelle Agrifood and Sykes (VO) [2020] UKUT 286 (LC); Johnson v Gore Wood & Co [2002] HL 2 AC; Society of Medical Officers of Health v Hope (VO) [1960] HL AC551; Michael Pearce (VO) [2014] UKUT 0291 (LC); Arnold v National Westminster Bank plc [1991] 2 AC 93; Arnold v Dearing [2019] UKUT 224 (LC)
- Hearing
- 19 March 2021
Similar decisions
- 12th-24th Flrs 5 Bank Street, E14 4BG — Allowed in part, 1 Dec 2025
- 81 Mile End Road, E1 4TT — Dismissed, 26 Sept 2025
- Grnd Flr And Pt 1st Flr At 429, Westferry Road, E14 3AL — Dismissed, 21 Jul 2025
- 6 TH FLR, COMMODITY QUAY, E1W 1AZ — Dismissed, 17 Apr 2025
All decisions in London Borough of Tower Hamlets · Offices nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.