Centre For Dentistry @ Sainsburys Wadsley Bridge, Claywheels Lane, S6 1LY
Decided 3 March 2023 28447514 Allsop LLP
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant did not attend the hearing and failed to submit a statement of case as required by tribunal directions. The Valuation Officer contended there was no case to answer. The tribunal, satisfied that the appellant had been properly notified and in the interests of proportionality and avoiding delay, proceeded in their absence. Finding no substantive argument disputing the rateable value, the tribunal determined that the entry in the 2010 non-domestic rating list was correct.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was the ratepayer, unrepresented.
Grounds argued
No grounds were argued — the decision records none.
- Evidence
- None from the ratepayer
Similar decisions
- 9 The Gallery, Meadowhall Centre, S9 1ER — Agreed at hearing, 16 Jun 2026
- 41 -44, Park Lane,, Meadowhall Centre,, S9 1EL — Allowed in part, 1 May 2026
- 48 B & 49, High Street,, Meadowhall Centre,, S9 1EN — Allowed, 23 Apr 2026
- The Francis Newton, 7 Clarkehouse Road, S10 2LA — Dismissed, 20 Oct 2025
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.