Gnd F 102-104, High Street, W3 6QX
Decided 3 March 2023 28687831 Altus Group - 2010
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant failed to appear or be represented at the hearing and did not submit a statement of case. The Valuation Officer contended there was no case to answer. The tribunal found the failure to comply with directions regarding disclosure of statements of case was serious, and in the absence of any substantive argument disputing the rateable value, dismissed the appeal and confirmed the entry in the 2010 rating list as correct.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was the ratepayer, unrepresented.
Grounds argued
No grounds were argued — the decision records none.
- Evidence
- None from the ratepayer
Similar decisions
- Unit 42, Sheraton Business Centre, UB6 7JB — Allowed in part, 17 Jul 2026
- GND FLR, MEMO HOUSE, KENDAL AVENUE, KENDAL AVENUE, W3 0XA — Allowed, 7 May 2026
- UNIT 30, SILICON CENTRE, WADSWORTH ROAD, PERIVALE, PERIVALE, UB6 7JZ — Dismissed, 31 Dec 2025
- 161, BRENT PARK INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, BRENT ROAD, UB2 5LJ — Agreed at hearing, 9 Dec 2025
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.