Regis Beauty Salon At Tesco, Hazelmere, Pitsea, Pitsea, SS13 3JU
Decided 3 March 2023 30591515 Allsop LLP
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The Appellant failed to submit a statement of case and did not attend the hearing. The Valuation Officer contended there was no case to answer regarding the rateable value entry in the 2010 rating list. The Tribunal found the entry was correct and dismissed the appeal due to the Appellant's serious non-compliance with procedural directions and absence of substantive argument.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was the ratepayer, unrepresented.
Grounds argued
No grounds were argued — the decision records none.
- Evidence
- None from the ratepayer
Similar decisions
- UNITS BF OAKWOOD HOUSE, TONBRIDGE ROAD, HAROLD HILL, RM3 8TS — Dismissed, 25 Jun 2025
- HARRIS DISTRIBUTION LTD, JOSSELIN ROAD, SS13 1QF — Allowed in part, 17 Jan 2025
- HARRIS DISTRIBUTION LTD, JOSSELIN ROAD, SS13 1QF — Allowed in part, 17 Jan 2025
- 2 ND FLR SIDNEY HOUSE, CHRISTY CLOSE, CHRISTY WAY, CHRISTY WAY, SS15 6TN — Allowed in part, 31 Dec 2024
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.