Tribunals · Basildon Borough Council · 2023 rating list

1ST FLR SIDNEY HOUSE, CHRISTY CLOSE, CHRISTY WAY, CHRISTY WAY, SS15 6TN

Offices and premises Decided 31 December 2024 CHG101175073 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV£21,500£210.04/m²
Ratepayer sought£13,750
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£18,000£165/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant company challenged the RV of £21,500 on the grounds that it was excessive, proposing £15,500 initially and then £13,750 based on an unadjusted base rate of £125 psm. The tribunal found the original RV unreasonable, but determined that although rental evidence from the subject building and comparable properties on the industrial estate supported a lower valuation, the appellant's proposed base rate was too aggressive. The tribunal placed most weight on rents at Argent Court closest to the antecedent valuation date and on Astra House on the same side of the estate, determining an RV of £18,000 based on £165 psm.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Forest Gate Construction Co. Limited, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence · decisive
  • Comparable assessments (tone)
Evidence
Rents, Expert report
Cases cited
Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson (VO) [2018] UKUT 0253 (LC)
Hearing
4 December 2024

Similar decisions

All decisions in Basildon Borough Council · Offices nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.