In-Post Delivery Locker At Morrison, Springhill, TF1 1RP
Decided 21 March 2023 30602472 Lambert Smith Hampton - Sheffield
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant failed to attend the hearing or submit a statement of case, despite being notified of the proceedings. The Valuation Officer contended there was no case to answer. The tribunal dismissed the appeal due to the appellant's serious failure to comply with directions for disclosure of statements of case and the absence of any substantive argument disputing the rateable value.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was the ratepayer, unrepresented.
Grounds argued
No grounds were argued — the decision records none.
- Evidence
- None from the ratepayer
Similar decisions
- UNIT F, HALESFIELD 14, TF7 4QR — Dismissed, 2 Jul 2024
- WRAP FILM SYSTEMS LTD, HORTONWOOD 45, TF1 7FA — Allowed in part, 2 Apr 2024
- WRAP FILM SYSTEMS LTD, HORTONWOOD 45, TF1 7FA — Allowed in part, 2 Apr 2024
- HORTON HOUSE, HALESFIELD 19, TF7 4QT — Dismissed, 31 Jul 2023
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.