Tribunals · Telford & Wrekin Council · 2017 rating list

UNIT F, HALESFIELD 14, TF7 4QR

Training centre and premises Decided 2 July 2024 CHG101052535 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV£58,000£30/m²
Ratepayer sought£52,500
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£58,000£30/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant argued that the unadjusted rate of £30/m² was excessive based on rental and comparable property evidence and proposed a reduction to £27.25/m². The tribunal found that whilst the appellant's comparables were persuasive on some points, the assessments of properties on either side of the subject property carried more weight, and the subject property's own rent of £37.63/m² agreed close to the AVD supported the current valuation. The tribunal determined the burden of proof was on the appellant to demonstrate the RV was unreasonable and was not satisfied by the evidence presented.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Evolution Foods Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence
  • Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
Hearing
3 June 2024

Similar decisions

All decisions in Telford & Wrekin Council · Industrial and warehouses nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.