UNIT F, HALESFIELD 14, TF7 4QR
Training centre and premises Decided 2 July 2024 CHG101052535 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant argued that the unadjusted rate of £30/m² was excessive based on rental and comparable property evidence and proposed a reduction to £27.25/m². The tribunal found that whilst the appellant's comparables were persuasive on some points, the assessments of properties on either side of the subject property carried more weight, and the subject property's own rent of £37.63/m² agreed close to the AVD supported the current valuation. The tribunal determined the burden of proof was on the appellant to demonstrate the RV was unreasonable and was not satisfied by the evidence presented.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Evolution Foods Ltd, represented.
Grounds argued
- Rental evidence
- Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
- Evidence
- Rents, Settled assessments
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
- Hearing
- 3 June 2024
Similar decisions
- WRAP FILM SYSTEMS LTD, HORTONWOOD 45, TF1 7FA — Allowed in part, 2 Apr 2024
- WRAP FILM SYSTEMS LTD, HORTONWOOD 45, TF1 7FA — Allowed in part, 2 Apr 2024
- HORTON HOUSE, HALESFIELD 19, TF7 4QT — Dismissed, 31 Jul 2023
All decisions in Telford & Wrekin Council · Industrial and warehouses nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.