Regis Salon At Tesco Extra, Mansell Way, Horwich, Horwich, BL6 6JS
Decided 3 March 2023 30627894 Allsop LLP
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant failed to attend or be represented at the hearing and did not submit statements of case to the Tribunal. The Valuation Officer contended there was no case to answer. The Tribunal dismissed the appeal due to the appellant's serious failure to comply with disclosure directions and absence of substantive argument challenging the rateable value.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was the ratepayer, unrepresented.
Grounds argued
No grounds were argued — the decision records none.
- Evidence
- None from the ratepayer
Similar decisions
- UNIT B2, BRIDGEWATER AVENUE, BOLTON, BL5 1EE — Dismissed, 23 Jul 2026
- 17-19 Brackley Street, BL4 9DS — Dismissed, 24 Feb 2026
- 322 & 1ST FLOOR 324 CROMPTON WAY, BL2 2NE — Dismissed, 10 Sept 2025
- Greggs, 64-66 Deansgate, BL1 1BG — Allowed, 5 Sept 2025
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.