Your Beauty At Tesco 1, Bradgate Mall, LE4 1DE
Decided 3 March 2023 30698878 Allsop
Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2010 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant failed to attend the hearing or provide a statement of case despite proper notice being given. The Valuation Officer contended there was no case to answer due to the appellant's non-compliance with tribunal directions on disclosure. The tribunal dismissed the appeal on the basis that the entry in the 2010 non-domestic rating list was correct, given the serious procedural failure and absence of any substantive challenge to the rateable value.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was the ratepayer, unrepresented.
Grounds argued
No grounds were argued — the decision records none.
- Evidence
- None from the ratepayer
Similar decisions
- 2 A, NEW STAR ROAD, LE4 9LP — Dismissed, 9 Oct 2026
- 23, NEW STAR ROAD, LE4 9JD — Dismissed, 8 Oct 2026
- 19 AND 21, NEW STAR ROAD, LE4 9JD — Dismissed, 8 Oct 2026
- 20 HUMBERSTONE GATE, LE1 3PH — Allowed in part, 8 Jun 2026
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.