Beauty Salon At Tesco 700, Great Horton Road, BD7 4EP
Decided 3 March 2023 30698907 Allsop LLP
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant failed to attend the hearing or submit a statement of case despite being notified of the hearing date. The Valuation Officer contended there was no case to answer. The tribunal, finding no substantive argument disputing the rateable value and noting the appellant's serious failure to comply with disclosure directions, confirmed that the entry in the 2010 rating list was correct.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was the ratepayer, unrepresented.
Grounds argued
No grounds were argued — the decision records none.
- Evidence
- None from the ratepayer
Similar decisions
- Parkinson - Spencer Refractories Limited, Amblerthorn Fireclay Works, HX3 6SX — Allowed in part, 7 Aug 2026
- UNIT 4E, EUROWAY ESTATE, WHARFEDALE ROAD,, BD4 6SG — Allowed in part, 25 Sept 2025
- Fleece Inn, 63-67 Main Street, BD22 8DA — Dismissed, 4 Mar 2025
- Units 14 15A and 15B, Moors Shopping Centre, LS29 9LB — Allowed in part, 13 Jan 2025
All decisions in City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.