Tribunals · City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council · 2023 rating list

UNIT 4E, EUROWAY ESTATE, WHARFEDALE ROAD,, BD4 6SG

Warehouse and premises Decided 25 September 2025 CHG101249642 Ryan Property Tax Services UK Limited

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV£21,250£69/m²
Ratepayer sought£14,250
VO conceded first£19,750−7% before the hearing
Tribunal decided£17,750£62/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant challenged the valuation officer's assessment of £19,750 RV, arguing the tone of value for main space should be £55 per m2, based on the subject property's passing rent and comparable rental evidence from the Euroway Estate. The tribunal found the subject rent unreliable due to its stepped nature, but considered the comparable lettings persuasive, particularly Units 12a-12b and Unit 8a at Euroway Estate (at £45 and £52 per m2 respectively) for locality evidence and Units 7 and 5 at South Bradford Trading Estate for size comparability. The tribunal determined a tone of £62 per m2 was fair and reasonable, resulting in an RV of £17,750, allowing the appeal in part.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was 606 Strength and Conditioning, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Comparable assessments (tone)
Evidence
Rents
Cases cited
Lotus & Delta Ltd v Culverwell
Hearing
12 September 2025

Similar decisions

All decisions in City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council · Industrial and warehouses nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.