UNIT 4E, EUROWAY ESTATE, WHARFEDALE ROAD,, BD4 6SG
Warehouse and premises Decided 25 September 2025 CHG101249642 Ryan Property Tax Services UK Limited
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant challenged the valuation officer's assessment of £19,750 RV, arguing the tone of value for main space should be £55 per m2, based on the subject property's passing rent and comparable rental evidence from the Euroway Estate. The tribunal found the subject rent unreliable due to its stepped nature, but considered the comparable lettings persuasive, particularly Units 12a-12b and Unit 8a at Euroway Estate (at £45 and £52 per m2 respectively) for locality evidence and Units 7 and 5 at South Bradford Trading Estate for size comparability. The tribunal determined a tone of £62 per m2 was fair and reasonable, resulting in an RV of £17,750, allowing the appeal in part.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was 606 Strength and Conditioning, represented.
Grounds argued
- Comparable assessments (tone)
- Evidence
- Rents
- Cases cited
- Lotus & Delta Ltd v Culverwell
- Hearing
- 12 September 2025
Similar decisions
- Unit 1G, Sapper Jordan Rossi Park, Baildon, BD17 7AX — Dismissed, 14 Oct 2024
- TRICO VE LTD, CASTLEFIELDS LANE, BD16 2AB — Dismissed, 1 Feb 2024
- UNITS C D L&P, CASTLEFIELDS INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, CASTLEFIELDS ROAD, BD16 2AG — Allowed in part, 15 Jan 2024
- UNITS L & P, CASTLEFIELDS INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, CASTLEFIELDS ROAD, BD16 2AG — Allowed in part, 15 Jan 2024
All decisions in City of Bradford Metropolitan District Council · Industrial and warehouses nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.