Free news & data alerts
Log in
Tribunals · Daventry District Council · 2010 rating list

Daventry International Rail Freight Terminal, Railport Approach, Dirft, Dirft, NN6 7EL

Decided 7 July 2021 33389769 Rabbette

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV · 2010 list£147,000
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided—

Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2010 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 6 properties together and does not tie its figures clearly to this appeal, so the figures above are for the first property it lists. Every property is listed below.

The 6 properties in this decision

One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them (2010 list); this appeal’s property is highlighted.

The properties covered by this tribunal decision, with the figures it states for each
PropertyOriginal RVSoughtTribunal decidedOutcome
Daventry International Rail Freight Terminal, Railport Approach, Dirft, Northampton NN6 7ELThis appeal£147,000——Dismissed
W H Malcolm Celtic Way, Dirft, Northampton NN6 7GW£1,050,000——Dismissed
Daventry International Rail Freight Terminal, Railport Approach, Dirft, Northampton NN6 7EL£147,000——Dismissed
W H Malcolm Celtic Way, Dirft, Northampton NN6 7GW£1,050,000——Dismissed
Daventry International Rail Freight Terminal, Railport Approach, Dirft, Northampton NN6 7EL£147,000——Dismissed
W H Malcolm Celtic Way, Dirft, Northampton NN6 7GW£1,050,000——Dismissed

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant sought to merge two hereditaments (Daventry International Rail Freight Terminal and W H Malcolm warehouse) under the Rating (Property in Common Occupation) Act 2018, arguing they should be treated as one property from 1 April 2010. The tribunal found the proposals invalid because they could have been lodged under the law as it existed before the 2018 Act came into force, meaning the change in law was not the reason for the proposals and they did not meet the definition of 'relevant proposal' under the amendment regulations.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Malcolm Group Limited, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Split or merge the assessment
  • Validity of the proposal
Evidence
Expert report
Hearing
14 June 2021

Similar decisions

All decisions in Daventry District Council · Industrial and warehouses nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.