Free news & data alerts
Log in
Tribunals · Manchester City Council · 2010 rating list

2Nd Flr Alpha House, Rowlandsway, Manchester, Manchester, M22 5RG

Offices and Premises Decided 16 February 2021 33861521 Fifield Glyn

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV · 2010 list£39,500
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided—

Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2010 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 12 properties together and does not tie its figures clearly to this appeal, so the figures above are for the first property it lists. Every property is listed below.

The 12 properties in this decision

One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them (2010 list); this appeal’s property is highlighted.

The properties covered by this tribunal decision, with the figures it states for each
PropertyOriginal RVSoughtTribunal decidedOutcome
2Nd Flr Alpha HouseThis appeal£39,500——Dismissed
3Rd Flr Alpha House£39,500——Dismissed
Abercorn Ltd Pt 7th Flr Alpha House£17,750——Dismissed
Factory Estates Ltd (O) Pt 6th Flr Alpha House£16,500——Dismissed
Montedison Uk Ltd Pt 5th Flr Alpha House£24,750——Dismissed
Ness Ltd Pt 5th Flr Alpha House£8,900——Dismissed
Pansofic Systems Pt 6th Flr Alpha House£13,250——Dismissed
Pt 5th Flr Alpha House Properties Ltd£5,600——Dismissed
Pt 6th Flr Alpha House£4,700——Dismissed
Stormhill Properties Ltd (O) Pt Gnd Flr Alpha House£13,250——Dismissed
Trend Communications Pt 6th Flr Alpha House£3,650——Dismissed
Wire & Wire Rope Employers Assoc Pt Properties Ltd 4th Flr Alpha House£9,200——Dismissed

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant sought to merge 12 separate assessments in a multi-storey office building into a single hereditament, relying on amendments to Section 64 of the Local Government Finance Act 1988 introduced by the Rating (Property in Common Occupation) and Council Tax (Empty Dwellings) Act 2018. The tribunal found the proposal invalid because the properties did not meet the criteria under subsection 3ZB, specifically: the properties had not all ceased to be occupied on the same day (ground floor was occupied as at 1 April 2010), and even if unoccupied, they were not previously a single hereditament under subsection 3ZA. The tribunal dismissed the appeal, finding the regulations were clear and unambiguous in their requirements.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Stormhill Properties Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Split or merge the assessment
  • Validity of the proposal
Evidence
Rents
Cases cited
Mazars; Libra Textiles Ltd T/A Boundary Mills Stores and Centric Assets Ltd v Ritchie Roberts and David Alford
Hearing
20 January 2021

Similar decisions

All decisions in Manchester City Council · Offices nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.