Free news & data alerts
Log in
Tribunals · Manchester City Council · 2017 rating list

Pt 5th (East) & 6th Flrs XYZ Building, 2, Hardman Boulevard,, M3 3AQ

Offices and premises Decided 6 September 2024 CHG100528632 CBRE

OutcomeAllowedThe tribunal reduced the rateable value.
Original RV · 2017 list£640,000
Ratepayer sought£510,000
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£595,000from 6 Jun 2017

Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2017 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 2 properties together; the figures above are for this appeal's property (Pt 5th (East) & 6th Flrs XYZ Building, 2, Hardman Boulevard, Manchester M3 3AQ). Every property is listed below.

The 2 properties in this decision

One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them (2017 list); this appeal’s property is highlighted.

The properties covered by this tribunal decision, with the figures it states for each
PropertyOriginal RVSoughtTribunal decidedOutcome
Pt 5th (East) & 6th Flrs XYZ Building, 2, Hardman Boulevard, Manchester M3 3AQThis appeal£640,000£510,000£595,000Allowed
Part 4th Floor 5 St Pauls Square, Liverpool L3 9SJ£74,000£33,000£44,000Allowed

What was argued and what the tribunal found

Shoosmiths LLP appealed the Valuation Officer's assessment of £640,000 RV for modern office space (5th and 6th floors) in Manchester city centre, proposing £510,000 RV (£179/m²). The tribunal analysed comparable Category A rental evidence and Category B fit-out value. The tribunal rejected the VO's amortisation approach for Category B fit-out costs and adopted a fixed uplift of £15/m² to reflect Category B value (rather than the VO's approach of capitalising actual fit-out costs). Based on comparable evidence yielding £195/m² for Category A, with the £15/m² adjustment, the tribunal determined £210/m² as the appropriate tone, resulting in an RV of £595,000.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Shoosmiths LLP, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence · decisive
  • Comparable assessments (tone)
  • Valuation method
  • Quantum or end allowance
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments, Expert report
Cases cited
Bunyan (VO) v Acenden Limited [2023] UKUT 17 (LC); Porter (VO) v Trustees of Gladman SIPPS [2011] RA 33; Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson (VO) [2018] UKUT 0253 (LC)
Hearing
22 July 2024

Similar decisions

All decisions in Manchester City Council · Offices nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.