Tribunals · Wiltshire Council · 2017 rating list

UNIT 3,, ATWORTH BUSINESS PARK,, BATH ROAD,, BATH ROAD,, SN12 8SB

Industrial unit and premises Decided 3 March 2021 CHG100045316 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV£53,500£26/m²
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£53,500£26/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant argued that the property should be valued at £17.50 per m² (or alternatively £18.50 per m² with a 5% access allowance) based on the actual rent of £38,000 per annum (£17.44 per m²) and citing Lotus and Delta v Culverwell for the hierarchy of evidence. The Valuation Officer maintained £26 per m² was correct based on comparable rents from similar and larger properties. The tribunal dismissed the appeal, finding that whilst concerned about anomalies in the lease (potential rent-free period and property condition), it could not rely on the analysed rent alone and was not persuaded the comparables supported the appellant's lower valuation; the appeal hereditament's size and access issues differentiated it from most comparables.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Stevens & Stevens LLP (Bristol Soaps), represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence
  • Comparable assessments (tone)
  • Valuation method
Evidence
Rents, Measurement survey
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
Hearing
16 February 2021

Similar decisions

All decisions in Wiltshire Council · Industrial and warehouses nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.