Auto Repair, 23 Commercial Road, ME2 2AD
Workshop and Premises Decided 11 December 2020 CHG100046711 Town & Country
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant, represented by a surveyor, argued for a reduction to £12,000 RV (£65/m²) based on rental evidence and comparables from the industrial estate. The tribunal found that the passing rent could not be relied upon due to uncertainties and that the VO's single comparable property (Unit 10 Invicta Business Park, valued at £80/m²) was the best available evidence. The tribunal confirmed the RV of £15,000 at £80/m² was fair and reasonable, dismissing the appeal as the appellant had failed to provide evidence that Unit 10 was not a reasonable comparable.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Auto Repair (Medway) Ltd, represented.
Grounds argued
- Rental evidence
- Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
- Evidence
- Rents, Settled assessments
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
Similar decisions
- 10, Saracen Close, Gillingham Business Park, ME8 0PY — Allowed, 8 Jul 2025
- TRANSIT (MEDWAY) LIMITED, CROWN WHARF, ROCHESTER, ROCHESTER, ME2 4EP — Allowed in part, 28 Sept 2022
All decisions in Medway Council · Industrial and warehouses nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.