Tribunals · Stroud District Council · 2017 rating list

UNIT 2B,, BRIMSCOMBE PORT BUSINESS PARK,, BRIMSCOMBE,, BRIMSCOMBE,, GL5 2QQ

Industrial unit and premises Decided 3 November 2020 CHG100054236 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed, leaving the value at the figure the Valuation Officer had already conceded.
Original RV£25,250£52.5/m²
Ratepayer sought£14,500
VO conceded first£22,000−13% before the hearing
Tribunal decided£22,000from 1 Apr 2017

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant, represented by Altus Group, challenged the rateable value of an industrial unit at Brimscombe Port Business Park, arguing the passing rent of £15,000 per annum should support a value of £14,500 (£34/m²) rather than the £22,000 listed (£52.50/m²). The tribunal found that rents on the Brimscombe estate were blighted by the prospect of redevelopment and were not reliable evidence of open market value, but that comparable industrial units at Oldends and Stonedale Road supported the current valuation. The appeal was dismissed and the RV of £22,000 from 1 April 2017 was confirmed.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Richard Cooper Bronze Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence · decisive
  • Comparable assessments (tone)
Evidence
Rents, Photographs
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Dawkins v Ash Brothers and Heaton
Hearing
26 October 2020

Similar decisions

All decisions in Stroud District Council · Industrial and warehouses nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.