146 High Street, Harborne, Birmingham, Birmingham, B17 9NN
Shop and premises Decided 17 November 2020 CHG100057143 Mark Radford Rating
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant argued that the ground floor front shop (estate agent) should be valued at £10,450 by excluding a 7.5m² common reception area and excluding the return frontage from the valuation. The tribunal found that the disputed area was not a common area essential to other tenants, was not clearly defined as separate from the shop, and should be included in the valuation. The tribunal also determined that the return frontage should be included as beneficial for displaying properties. The tribunal upheld the Valuation Officer's valuation at £14,250.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was an individual ratepayer, represented.
Grounds argued
- Zoning or layout
- Floor area or measurement
- Valuation method
- Evidence
- Photographs, Settled assessments
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
- Hearing
- 27 October 2020
Similar decisions
- UNIT 10, ONE STOP SHOPPING CENTRE, WALSALL ROAD, B42 1SF — Dismissed, 14 Jul 2026
- UNIT 6, ONE STOP SHOPPING CENTRE, WALSALL ROAD, B42 1SF — Dismissed, 14 Jul 2026
- UNIT 2A, FORT SHOPPING PARK, FORT PARKWAY, FORT PARKWAY, B24 9FP — Allowed, 7 Jul 2026
- 39-40, CANNON STREET, B2 5EE — Dismissed, 29 Jan 2026
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.