Tribunals · London Borough of Tower Hamlets · 2017 rating list

GND & PT 1ST FLR, 114 VALLANCE ROAD, E1 5BL

Gymnasium and premises Decided 24 September 2025 CHG100074884 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester/Ryan Property Tax Services UK Limited

OutcomeAllowedThe tribunal reduced the rateable value.
Original RV£116,000£170/m²
Ratepayer sought£85,000
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£85,000£125/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant argued the property should be valued as a gymnasium at £125/m² (the base rate for gyms) rather than an office at £170/m². The tribunal found that following planning permission and substantial structural works to convert the property into a gym in 2015, it should be valued as a gymnasium under the principle of rebus sic stantibus. The tribunal adopted £125/m² based on comparable gym properties (particularly The Pill Box at £130/m²), the agreed Greater London gym valuation scheme, and the rental evidence which was found to be an outlier, resulting in an allowed appeal and a reduced RV of £85,000.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Island Fitness Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence
  • Comparable assessments (tone)
Evidence
Rents, Expert report, Photographs
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Scottish & Newcastle Retail Limited & Allied Domecq Retailing Limited v R F Williams
Hearing
22 July 2025

Similar decisions

All decisions in London Borough of Tower Hamlets · Pubs, hotels and leisure nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.