Tribunals · Plymouth City Council · 2017 rating list

38, NEW GEORGE STREET, PL1 1RW

Shop and premises Decided 4 December 2020 CHG100075464 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester

OutcomeAllowedThe tribunal reduced the rateable value.
Original RV£73,500£1000/m²
Ratepayer sought£47,250
VO conceded first£67,000−9% before the hearing
Tribunal decided£47,250£700/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant, a retail company occupying a shop on New George Street, Plymouth, challenged the RV of £73,500. The appellant's valuer argued the ITZA rate should be £700 per m2 based on the passing rent (adjusted for stepped payments and rent-free periods) and comparable properties showing a sliding scale of values along the street, reflecting reduced demand away from the nearby Drakes Circus Shopping Centre. The Valuation Officer's comparables supported £1,000 per m2. The tribunal allowed the appeal, finding that the comparables 44 and 42 New George Street (with ITZA rates of £648 and £720 per m2 respectively) supported a rate of £700 per m2, and that a sudden drop from £1,000 to £500 per m2 was unreasonable.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Clubsport Skechers Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Comparable assessments (tone)
  • Zoning or layout
  • Rental evidence
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson
Hearing
10 November 2020

Similar decisions

All decisions in Plymouth City Council · Shops nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.