2ND FLR 61-65,, CONDUIT STREET,, W1S 2GB
Offices and premises Decided 15 October 2024 CHG100077147 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 3 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellants challenged the rateable values for three office floors at 61-65 Conduit Street, London in the 2017 rating list, proposing a rate of £755-810/m² instead of the adopted £900/m². The tribunal found the rental evidence for comparable properties in Conduit Street provided by the Valuation Officer, which were closer to the Antecedent Valuation Date and analysed to rents higher than £900/m², more persuasive than the appellant's single rent review dated 13 months after the AVD. The tribunal concluded the adopted level of value of £900/m² was reasonable and the appeals were dismissed.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was JRJ Investments Ltd, represented.
Grounds argued
- Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
- Rental evidence
- Evidence
- Rents, Settled assessments
- Cases cited
- Lotus & Delta v Culverwell; Lamb v Go Outdoors Ltd
- Hearing
- 16 September 2024
Similar decisions
- 6TH FLR 3-5, BURLINGTON GARDENS, W1S 3EP — Allowed, 21 Sept 2026
- 4th Flr East 3-5, Burlington Gardens, W1S 3EP — Allowed, 21 Sept 2026
- Westminster House, 7 Millbank, SW1P 3JA — Allowed in part, 17 Aug 2026
- PART 3RD FLR WEST, 1, NEWMAN STREET, W1T 1PB — Dismissed, 8 Jun 2026
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.