PT GND 1ST 2ND & MEZZ FS, 119-121 MIDDLESEX STREET, E1 7JF
Fitness centre and premises Decided 19 March 2025 CHG100079085 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester/Ryan Property Tax Services UK Limited
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant, a fitness centre operator, challenged the RV of £101,000 (based on £350/m²) and sought a reduction to £54,500 (£190/m²), arguing the property should be valued as a Pilates studio rather than on an office scheme basis. The tribunal found that the rent agreed in June 2013 (£95,000 per annum) less than two years before the antecedent valuation date (1 April 2015) was the strongest evidence, supporting the £350/m² valuation. The tribunal rejected the appellant's comparable properties as generally larger and less comparable, and found no persuasive evidence that the market had dropped sufficiently between 2013 and 2015 to justify the proposed £54,500 RV.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Ten Health and Fitness Ltd, represented.
Grounds argued
- Rental evidence · decisive
- Comparable assessments (tone)
- Evidence
- Rents, Settled assessments, Photographs, Expert report
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta Ltd v Culverwell
- Hearing
- 24 February 2025
Similar decisions
- GND F 2-4, BOTOLPH ALLEY, EC3R 8DR — Allowed in part, 27 Jun 2025
- 69-71 Queen Street, EC4R 1EE — Allowed in part, 13 Jul 2023
- 114, LONDON WALL, EC2M 5QD — Dismissed, 18 Nov 2022
- Vivat Bacchus, 47 Farringdon Street, EC4A 4LL — Allowed in part, 28 Jul 2021
All decisions in City of London Corporation · Pubs, hotels and leisure nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.