69-71 Queen Street, EC4R 1EE
Restaurant and premises Decided 13 July 2023 CHG100774608 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant challenged the rateable value of £84,000 (UAR £500 p/m2), seeking a reduction to £63,500 (UAR £375 p/m2), arguing the original valuation was unreasonable. The tribunal reviewed rental evidence including comparable properties (Bloomberg Arcade units) and concluded that a UAR of £450 p/m2 was reasonable, resulting in an approved rateable value of £76,000.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Homeslice Cannon Street Limited, represented.
Grounds argued
- Rental evidence · decisive
- Evidence
- Rents, Settled assessments
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson
- Hearing
- 3 July 2023
Similar decisions
- GND F 2-4, BOTOLPH ALLEY, EC3R 8DR — Allowed in part, 27 Jun 2025
- PT GND 1ST 2ND & MEZZ FS, 119-121 MIDDLESEX STREET, E1 7JF — Dismissed, 19 Mar 2025
- 114, LONDON WALL, EC2M 5QD — Dismissed, 18 Nov 2022
- Vivat Bacchus, 47 Farringdon Street, EC4A 4LL — Allowed in part, 28 Jul 2021
All decisions in City of London Corporation · Pubs, hotels and leisure nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.