Tribunals · Brighton and Hove City Council · 2017 rating list

29-31,, East Street,, BN1 1HL

Restaurant and Premises Decided 22 December 2020 CHG100082977 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV£120,000
Ratepayer sought£90,500
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£120,000

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant argued that the closure of four vacant units in the immediate locality constituted a material change of circumstances warranting a 25% reduction to £90,500 RV to reflect the fall in footfall and trade. The tribunal found that the closures had not been caused by physical changes to the locality but were due to economic factors after the antecedent valuation date, and there was insufficient evidence that a hypothetical landlord would have reduced rent on similar properties as a result of the vacancies. The appeal was dismissed and the assessment confirmed at £120,000 RV.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Englishs of Brighton, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Change of circumstances
  • Quantum or end allowance
Change of circumstances
vacant units closure
Evidence
Photographs, Trading accounts, Settled assessments
Cases cited
Pavlou (VO) [2015] UKUT 0102 (LC); Landsborough v Grace [2015]; Browns (Watford) Ltd v Dunlevey
Hearing
4 December 2020

Similar decisions

All decisions in Brighton and Hove City Council · Pubs, hotels and leisure nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.