1st Floor, 4 Roger Street, WC1N 2JX
Office and premises Decided 8 December 2020 CHG100084245
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant challenged the rateable value of £130,000, arguing that the valuation of £385.65/m2 did not reflect available rental evidence. The tribunal found the actual rent of the property (£127,270 from January 2015, adjusted to approximately £114,543) was the best evidence, being a lease renewal agreed close to the antecedent valuation date. The tribunal also considered comparable rental evidence from other floors in the same building, which confirmed the rental-based value was excessive compared to the list valuation. The appeal was allowed and the rateable value was reduced to £114,500.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Fleurets Ltd, represented.
Grounds argued
- Rental evidence
- Comparable assessments (tone)
- Evidence
- Rents, Settled assessments, Photographs
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta Ltd v Culverwell
- Hearing
- 3 December 2020
Similar decisions
- (INCL 2ND & 3RD FS STH 11) 10, NEW SQUARE, WC2A 3QD — Allowed, 18 Sept 2026
- 3RD FLR EAST 1, BEDFORD AVENUE, WC1B 3AU — Allowed in part, 18 Aug 2026
- 3rd Flr, 120 Holborn, EC1N 2TD — Mixed, 1 Jul 2026
- 65 King's Cross Road, WC1X 9LN — Agreed at hearing, 1 Jul 2026
All decisions in London Borough of Camden · Offices nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.