Free news & data alerts
Log in
Tribunals · London Borough of Camden · 2017 rating list

3rd Flr, 120 Holborn, EC1N 2TD

Office and premises Decided 1 July 2026 CHG100112254 Cluttons

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV · 2017 list£820,000
Ratepayer sought£770,000
VO conceded first£880,000
Tribunal decided£820,000from 1 Apr 2017

Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2017 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 2 properties together; the figures above are for this appeal's property (3RD FLOOR, 120 HOLBORN, LONDON EC1N 2TD). Every property is listed below.

The 2 properties in this decision

One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them (2017 list); this appeal’s property is highlighted.

The properties covered by this tribunal decision, with the figures it states for each
PropertyOriginal RVSoughtTribunal decidedOutcome
2ND FLOOR, 120 HOLBORN, LONDON EC1N 2TD£881,500£827,500£881,500Dismissed
3RD FLOOR, 120 HOLBORN, LONDON EC1N 2TDThis appeal£820,000£770,000£820,000Allowed in part

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant challenged the rateable values of two office floors at 120 Holborn, arguing for a tone of value of £470/m² based on comparable properties, while the VO defended £500/m² based on post-AVD rents and settled agreements on other floors. The tribunal dismissed appeal 1 for the 2nd Floor as the VO's valuation of £881,500 was reasonable, but allowed appeal 2 in part, reducing the 3rd Floor from £820,000 to £820,000 following recalculation due to amended floor area, finding the £500/m² tone had been established through settled assessments and lack of challenge on other floors in the building.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was TRAINLINE LTD, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence
  • Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
  • Valuation method
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments, Earlier tribunal decisions
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Futures (London) Ltd v Stratford; Specialeyes Plc v Felgate; Flight Centre (UK) limited v Ricketts; Pointer v Norwich Assessment Committee
Hearing
5 June 2026

Similar decisions

All decisions in London Borough of Camden · Offices nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.