UNIT 3.30 CANTERBURY COURT, 1-3 BRIXTON ROAD, SW9 6DE
Business Unit and Premises Decided 4 May 2021 CHG100086898 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant, occupier of Unit 3.30 Canterbury Court, sought reduction to £11,000 RV (£388 per m²), arguing that the leases did not meet rating hypotheses as FRI leases and required considerable adjustment, and that a 26% reduction applied to other units in the building should apply uniformly. The tribunal found that the leases, whilst not FRI, had been properly adjusted by the managing agents and the rental evidence for the third floor supported £525 per m². The tribunal dismissed the appeal, confirming RV £15,000, finding that settlements and comparable evidence did not justify rejecting the valuation officer's analysis.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Carislease, represented.
Grounds argued
- Rental evidence · decisive
- Comparable assessments (tone)
- Evidence
- Rents, Settled assessments, Earlier tribunal decisions
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
- Hearing
- 15 April 2021
Similar decisions
- UNIT SB 139 AT SOUTHBANK HOUSE, BLACK PRINCE ROAD, SE1 7SJ — Dismissed, 25 Sept 2025
- UNIT SB 139A AT SOUTH BANK HOUSE, BLACK PRINCE ROAD, SE1 7SJ — Dismissed, 25 Sept 2025
- UNIT SB.410-411 AT SOUTH BANK HOUSE, BLACK PRINCE ROAD, SE1 7SJ — Dismissed, 25 Sept 2025
- STUDIO G.03, CHESTER HOUSE, 13, BRIXTON ROAD, SW9 6DE — Dismissed, 9 Jul 2025
All decisions in London Borough of Lambeth · Offices nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.