7,, SHELDON WAY,, LARKFIELD,, LARKFIELD,, ME20 6SE
Warehouse and premises Decided 7 January 2021 CHG100090188 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 4 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellants argued that the rateable values were excessive based on the actual rent passing on Unit 4 Sheldon Way at £56.00/m2, which was a new letting closer to the antecedent valuation date. The tribunal found the subject property's rent to be the best evidence under Lotus and Delta principles, and rejected the Valuation Officer's comparable evidence from other locations as being from different valuation schemes with less direct comparability. The tribunal allowed the appeals and reduced the RVs for all four units by applying the rental-evidence adjustment proportionally across the size bands.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was B and W Engineering Services Ltd, represented.
Grounds argued
- Rental evidence
- Comparable assessments (tone)
- Evidence
- Rents, Expert report
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
- Hearing
- 8 December 2020
Similar decisions
- PLOTS A & B AT PLATT WORKS PLATT INDUSTRIAL ESTATE, MAIDSTONE ROAD, PLATT, PLATT, TN15 8JL — Mixed, 4 Oct 2023
- S&S Services Ltd, Sanderson Way, TN9 1QG — Allowed in part, 1 Apr 2022
- 6,, SHELDON WAY,, LARKFIELD,, LARKFIELD,, ME20 6SE — Allowed, 7 Jan 2021
- 12,, SHELDON WAY,, LARKFIELD,, LARKFIELD,, ME20 6SE — Allowed, 7 Jan 2021
All decisions in Tonbridge and Malling Borough Council · Industrial and warehouses nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.