Tribunals · Birmingham City Council · 2017 rating list

74 Bull Street, B4 6AD

Shop and premises Decided 24 March 2021 CHG100093129 Hartnell Taylor Cook

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV£46,250£550/m²
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first£48,500
Tribunal decided£41,250£460/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant argued the passing rent of £35,000-£39,000 (stepped over first five years) should be the basis for valuation without a 40% loading for tram works disruption. The tribunal found the passing rent was good evidence as a new letting agreed close to the material date, but agreed some adjustment for temporary disruption was warranted, though not the full 40% claimed. The tribunal adopted the year-five rent of £39,000 (£460/m2) as a fair reflection of open market value once works would be completed, reducing the RV from £46,250 to £41,250.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Titan Entertainment Group Limited, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence
  • Comparable assessments (tone)
Change of circumstances
tram works and bus stop removal
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta Limited v Culverwell
Hearing
9 March 2021

Similar decisions

All decisions in Birmingham City Council · Shops nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.