74 Bull Street, B4 6AD
Shop and premises Decided 24 March 2021 CHG100093129 Hartnell Taylor Cook
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant argued the passing rent of £35,000-£39,000 (stepped over first five years) should be the basis for valuation without a 40% loading for tram works disruption. The tribunal found the passing rent was good evidence as a new letting agreed close to the material date, but agreed some adjustment for temporary disruption was warranted, though not the full 40% claimed. The tribunal adopted the year-five rent of £39,000 (£460/m2) as a fair reflection of open market value once works would be completed, reducing the RV from £46,250 to £41,250.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Titan Entertainment Group Limited, represented.
Grounds argued
- Rental evidence
- Comparable assessments (tone)
- Change of circumstances
- tram works and bus stop removal
- Evidence
- Rents, Settled assessments
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta Limited v Culverwell
- Hearing
- 9 March 2021
Similar decisions
- UNIT 10, ONE STOP SHOPPING CENTRE, WALSALL ROAD, B42 1SF — Dismissed, 14 Jul 2026
- UNIT 6, ONE STOP SHOPPING CENTRE, WALSALL ROAD, B42 1SF — Dismissed, 14 Jul 2026
- UNIT 2A, FORT SHOPPING PARK, FORT PARKWAY, FORT PARKWAY, B24 9FP — Allowed, 7 Jul 2026
- 39-40, CANNON STREET, B2 5EE — Dismissed, 29 Jan 2026
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.