Tribunals · Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea · 2017 rating list

266,, OLD BROMPTON ROAD,, SW5 9HR

Shop and premises Decided 14 December 2020 CHG100113699 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV£52,500£900/m²
Ratepayer sought£42,500
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£52,500£900/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant argued that the rateable value should be reduced to £42,500 based on the lease rent of £42,000 per annum (analysed at £723/m²) and proposing a zone A rate of £775/m². The tribunal applied the Lotus and Delta v Culverwell framework and found that whilst the subject property's actual rent was significantly lower than comparable properties in the same and nearby parades (which analysed between £850/m² and £963/m²), the appellant had not provided sufficient evidence to establish that a rate lower than £900/m² should be adopted. The tribunal noted that the subject property's rent had not increased since 2009 and appeared unrepresentative of market value, whereas nearby comparable properties consistently supported the £900/m² valuation.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Libertybelle UK Limited, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence
  • Comparable assessments (tone)
Evidence
Rents, Expert report
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
Hearing
8 December 2020

Similar decisions

All decisions in Royal Borough of Kensington and Chelsea · Shops nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.