Tribunals · London Borough of Islington · 2017 rating list

Corner of Parkhurst Road / Camden Road, N7 0SH

Workshop and premises Decided 26 August 2021 CHG100120083 Rapleys LLP - Alan Watson

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed, leaving the value at the figure the Valuation Officer had already conceded.
Original RV£24,250£90/m²
Ratepayer sought£20,000
VO conceded first£23,500−3% before the hearing
Tribunal decided£27,500£106.38/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant argued the rateable value should be £20,000 based on the actual rent agreed on 25 December 2016. The Tribunal accepted the Valuation Officer's amended valuation of £27,500 (reflecting £115/m2 adjusted to £106.38/m2 with layout allowance) and dismissed the appeal. Although the appeal property's rent was relevant evidence, it was agreed 20 months after the antecedent valuation date and was a tenant holding over rather than a new letting; by contrast, comparable industrial properties showed rents of £106.69-£135.15/m2 from open market lettings closer to the valuation date, which carried greater weight under the rating hypothesis.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Nexlynn Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence
  • Comparable assessments (tone)
Evidence
Rents, comparable_assessments, Photographs
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta Ltd v Culverwell
Hearing
23 August 2021

Similar decisions

All decisions in London Borough of Islington · Industrial and warehouses nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.