Unit 2 Castle Street Mall, Grosvenor Shopping Centre, SK11 6AF
Shop and premises Decided 17 September 2021 CHG100126013 Deloitte LLP - Yee Ke
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant (TK Maxx) argued that fitting out costs should be reflected by applying a 10% uplift to the analysed rent of £38 per m², resulting in £42 per m² and a proposed RV of £100,000. The Valuation Officer contended that, given actual fitting out costs were known and the property was let to an anchor tenant (warranting caution with the rent), the fitting out costs should be fully analysed over the 10-year break clause period, resulting in a price per m² of £87.56. The tribunal dismissed the appeal, accepting the Valuation Officer's method of analysing the actual fitting out costs over 10 years rather than applying the 10% uplift to the analysed rent, and confirmed the RV of £216,000 as correct.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was T K Maxx, represented.
Grounds argued
- Rental evidence
- Valuation method · decisive
- Evidence
- Rents, Expert report
- Cases cited
- Edma (Jewellers) Ltd v Moore (VO) 1975
- Hearing
- 23 August 2021
Similar decisions
- Boots, Handforth Dean Retail Park, SK9 3PA — Allowed in part, 6 Feb 2024
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.