Free news & data alerts
Log in
Tribunals · Watford Borough Council · 2017 rating list

GND FLR SUNNINGDALE 13,, COLONIAL WAY, WD24 4WH

Office and premises Decided 10 December 2020 CHG100126737 Ryan

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV · 2017 list£68,000
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£68,000from 1 Apr 2017

Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2017 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 2 properties together; the figures above are for this appeal's property (Ground Floor, Sunningdale 13 Colonial Way, Watford WD24 4WH). Every property is listed below.

The 2 properties in this decision

One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them (2017 list); this appeal’s property is highlighted.

The properties covered by this tribunal decision, with the figures it states for each
PropertyOriginal RVSoughtTribunal decidedOutcome
Turnberry, The Belfry, 13 Colonial Way, Watford WD24 4WH£93,500—£93,500Dismissed
Ground Floor, Sunningdale 13 Colonial Way, Watford WD24 4WHThis appeal£68,000—£68,000Dismissed

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant sought to merge two separate office buildings (Turnberry with RV £93,500 and Ground Floor Sunningdale with RV £68,000) into one assessment valued at £137,000, arguing that following the 2018 Act reversing Woolway v Mazars, the buildings should be treated as contiguous and jointly occupied. The tribunal found that although the buildings were in the same occupation and separated only by a passageway, they were detached with no shared walls or enclosures, and the passageway was not established to be in the appellant's exclusive occupation. Therefore the two properties remained separate hereditaments under the statutory definition of contiguity, and the appeal was dismissed.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Emis Group Plc, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Split or merge the assessment
Evidence
Rents
Cases cited
Woolway v Mazars [2015] UKSC 53; Roberts (Valuation Officer) v Blackhouse Jones Ltd [2020] UKUT 38 (LC)
Hearing
3 December 2020

Similar decisions

All decisions in Watford Borough Council · Offices nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.