First Floor, 2 Gerrard Place, W1D 5PB
Offices and premises Decided 17 March 2021 CHG100126747
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant company argued that the rateable value of £23,000 (£499 per m²) was excessive and should be reduced to £14,500 (£300 per m²), relying on comparable properties across Charing Cross Road. The tribunal found that the Valuation Officer's comparables in the immediate vicinity demonstrated that £499 per m² was reasonable, and that the passing rent of £21,000 agreed in September 2014, when adjusted upwards by approximately 5% to the April 2015 antecedent valuation date, supported the assessment at around £23,000 per annum. The appeal was dismissed as the appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence to show the assessment was unreasonable.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Saintta International Lawyers UK Ltd, represented.
Grounds argued
- Rental evidence
- Comparable assessments (tone)
- Evidence
- Rents
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
- Hearing
- 8 March 2021
Similar decisions
- 6TH FLR 3-5, BURLINGTON GARDENS, W1S 3EP — Allowed, 21 Sept 2026
- 4th Flr East 3-5, Burlington Gardens, W1S 3EP — Allowed, 21 Sept 2026
- Westminster House, 7 Millbank, SW1P 3JA — Allowed in part, 17 Aug 2026
- PART 3RD FLR WEST, 1, NEWMAN STREET, W1T 1PB — Dismissed, 8 Jun 2026
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.