Tribunals · City of Westminster · 2017 rating list

2ND FLR, 36-38 LEXINGTON STREET, W1F 0LJ

Offices and premises Decided 11 June 2021 CHG100131475 Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV£36,500£500/m²
Ratepayer sought£28,750
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£36,500£500/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 4 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant contended that the rateable values of four office floors should be reduced from £36,500-£38,500 to £26,000-£28,750 based on a price per m2 of £375 instead of £500. The appellant relied on rental evidence from comparable properties in other streets and settlements reached after challenge decisions. The tribunal found that the comparable properties and settlements were not located within the same locality as the subject properties and placed most weight on rental evidence from 46 Lexington Street in the same street, which supported the existing valuations. The appellant failed to discharge the burden of proof that the properties were overvalued, and the appeals were dismissed.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was ALR Music Limited, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence
  • Comparable assessments (tone)
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
Hearing
13 May 2021

Similar decisions

All decisions in City of Westminster · Offices nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.