Ground floor shop 3 Market Street, TQ1 3AA
Shop and Premises Decided 17 September 2021 CHG100149367
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant challenged the RV of £14,250 (reduced from the original £14,750) arguing it was too high based on rental evidence for the subject property and poor comparability of the VO's comparable properties. The VO defended the RV of £14,250, relying on comparable retail properties in Torquay and applying a Zone A rate of £290/m². The tribunal accepted that comparable properties on the harbourside were not appropriate comparables due to their superior location, and found the subject property's inferior position on a side street warranted a lower Zone A rate of £250/m², reducing the RV to £12,250.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was an individual ratepayer, represented.
Grounds argued
- Rental evidence
- Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
- Evidence
- Rents, Settled assessments
- Cases cited
- Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Garton v Hunter
- Hearing
- 24 August 2021
Similar decisions
- 97-99 Winner Street, TQ3 3BP — Dismissed, 27 Nov 2020
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.