Free news & data alerts
Log in
Tribunals · Bath and North East Somerset Council · 2017 rating list

Hare & Hounds, Lansdown Road, BA1 5TJ

Public house and premises Decided 25 March 2022 CHG100159474 Mark Wasilewski

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed, leaving the value at the figure the Valuation Officer had already conceded.
Original RV · 2017 list£102,000
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first£90,000−12% before the hearing
Tribunal decided£90,000from 1 Apr 2017

Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2017 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 3 properties together; the figures above are for this appeal's property (Hare & Hounds, Lansdown Road, Bath BA1 5TJ). Every property is listed below.

The 3 properties in this decision

One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them (2017 list); this appeal’s property is highlighted.

The properties covered by this tribunal decision, with the figures it states for each
PropertyOriginal RVSoughtTribunal decidedOutcome
Marlborough Tavern, Marlborough Buildings, Bath BA1 2LY£69,500—£66,400Dismissed
The Chequers Inn, 50 Rivers Street, Bath BA1 2QA£59,750—£43,750Dismissed
Hare & Hounds, Lansdown Road, Bath BA1 5TJThis appeal£102,000—£90,000Dismissed

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant challenged the valuations of three public houses valued using the Rating Lists 2017 Valuation of Public Houses Approved Guide. The appellant argued the Guide was flawed and proposed valuations using the Contractor's basis and receipts and expenditure methods. The tribunal found the Guide was properly approved by the Pubs Rating Forum and based on rental evidence from approximately 1,100 public houses. The tribunal concluded that the Guide should be followed as binding precedent required, and that reductions already applied to dry trade FMT adequately reflected overtrading. Accordingly, the appeals were dismissed and the reduced assessments left in the list were upheld.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was The Bath Pub Company Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Valuation method
  • Trading receipts (pubs, hotels)
  • Comparable assessments (tone)
Evidence
Rents, Trading accounts, Expert report
Cases cited
J D Wetherspoon v Day (VO) RA/11/2005; Lamb (VO) v Go Outdoors Ltd [2015] UKUT 366
Hearing
1 February 2022

Similar decisions

All decisions in Bath and North East Somerset Council · Pubs, hotels and leisure nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.