Tribunals · London Borough of Camden · 2017 rating list

BST & GND FLR, UNIT 1, CAFE ROUGE 77 KINGSWAY, wc2b 6st

Restaurant and premises Decided 13 January 2023 CHG100160548 Gerald Eve LLP - CCA

OutcomeAllowedThe tribunal reduced the rateable value.
Original RV£257,500£1000/m²
Ratepayer sought£164,000
VO conceded first£246,000−4% before the hearing
Tribunal decided£164,000£630/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant, a restaurant operator, challenged the original rateable value of £257,500 (£1,000/m²), arguing the property should be valued at £164,000 (£630/m²) using A3 (restaurant) comparables rather than A1 (retail) classification, and citing actual rent evidence of £158,000 pa (2014) and £185,000 pa (2019) analysing to £614.52/m² and £719.50/m² respectively. The tribunal found the actual rent evidence was strong, not an outlier, and supported by comparable evidence from other Kingsway properties (123 Kingsway at £575/m² and 50-54 Kingsway at £691/m²), rejecting the respondent's reliance on newer lettings at higher rates. The tribunal determined the rate of £630/m² was reasonable, allowing the appeal.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Casual Dining Services Limited, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
  • Rental evidence
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Specialeyes plc v Felgate
Hearing
5 January 2023

Similar decisions

All decisions in London Borough of Camden · Pubs, hotels and leisure nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.