Tribunals · London Borough of Camden · 2017 rating list

M196 1st Flr A1 Upper Lock, Hawley Wharf, Camden Lock, Commercial Place, Commercial Place, NW1 8RP

Restaurant unit Decided 7 June 2024 CHG101071152 Knight Frank - Rating

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV—
Ratepayer sought£19,000
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£27,750£600/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant's representative argued that the subject restaurant unit at Hawley Wharf Market should be valued at £19,000 (£410/m²) based on rental evidence affected by Covid-related concessions and comparable modern developments. The Valuation Officer contended for £1,400/m² based on actual rents paid and comparable assessment at 250 Camden High Street. The tribunal determined £27,750 (£600/m²), finding the VO's valuation excessive compared to premium London locations while accepting that Camden Market's tourist destination status warranted a higher value than similar developments in Kings Cross, and using the first-floor comparable at 250 Camden High Street as a benchmark.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was A'DO'RE fritto, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence
  • Comparable assessments (tone) · decisive
Evidence
Rents, tone_of_list_comparables
Cases cited
Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson (VO)
Hearing
20 May 2024

Similar decisions

All decisions in London Borough of Camden · Pubs, hotels and leisure nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.