Tribunals · Wealden District Council · 2017 rating list

SIMPSONS UCKFIELD, BELLBROOK INDUSTRIAL PARK, BELL LANE, BELL LANE, TN22 1PH

Car Showroom and Premises Decided 22 April 2022 CHG100162841 Altus Group/Altus Group - Oakland - Manchester

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV£107,000£180/m²
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first£99,000−7% before the hearing
Tribunal decided£99,000£127.5/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant argued the £180/m² rate was excessive, proposing £77,000 RV based on the 2014 rent (analysed at £117.40/m²). The Valuation Officer conceded the rate was excessive and reduced it to £150/m² (adjusted to £127.50/m² for location), resulting in £99,000 RV. The tribunal accepted the VO's revised valuation as the base rate of £150/m² was reasonable given the valuation scheme, rental evidence, and comparable properties, and found the VO's location adjustment of 15% justified. The tribunal was not satisfied the appellant had proven the valuation should be reduced further.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was St Leonards Motors Ltd, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence
  • Comparable assessments (tone)
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments, Photographs, Expert report
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson
Hearing
23 March 2022

Similar decisions

All decisions in Wealden District Council · Shops nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.