Tribunals · Derby City Council · 2017 rating list

Unit 1, The Corn Exchange, DE1 2DS

Shop and premises Decided 22 February 2022 CHG100180387 David Brown Commercial - Robert Riley

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV£29,000
Ratepayer sought£15,500
VO conceded first£23,250−20% before the hearing
Tribunal decided£16,500£140/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant challenged the rateable value of Unit 1, The Corn Exchange, Derby, originally £29,000 and reduced by the VO to £23,250, arguing that the Zone A price of £200 per m2 was excessive. The appellant proposed £135 per m2 based on comparable rents from other units in the Corn Exchange building. The tribunal allowed the appeal in part, finding that rental evidence from units within the Corn Exchange (ranging from £124-£165 per m2) demonstrated a pattern of lower values than the VO's comparables, which were more modern purpose-built units. The tribunal adopted £140 per m2 as reasonable, particularly as this aligned with a contemporaneous rent only six months from the AVD, and determined a rateable value of £16,500.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Morgan Industrial Properties Limited, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Comparable assessments (tone)
  • Rental evidence
Evidence
Rents
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell
Hearing
14 February 2022

Similar decisions

All decisions in Derby City Council · Shops nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.