Tribunals · London Borough of Camden · 2017 rating list

Gnd F Front, 319-323 West End Lane, NW6 1RN

Shop and Premises Decided 23 December 2022 CHG100181301 GL Hearn Limited - Star 2017

OutcomeDismissedThe appeal failed and the rateable value was left unchanged.
Original RV£172,000£900/m²
Ratepayer sought£133,000
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£172,000£900/m²

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant sought to reduce the rateable value from £172,000 to £133,000, arguing that the zone A rate of £900 per m² was excessive compared to other retail units on West End Lane valued at £750 per m², and that size/layout and return frontage allowances should be adjusted. The tribunal found that the subject property was significantly larger and distinctive compared to other properties on the street, attracting different types of retail bids, and that the passing rent of £160,000 pa (increasing to £180,133 pa), when adjusted to account for a £150,000 premium paid, supported the current valuation of £172,000 at £900 per m².

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was John Lewis Partnership (Include Waitrose), represented.

Grounds argued

  • Rental evidence
  • Comparable assessments (tone)
  • Quantum or end allowance
Evidence
Rents, Settled assessments
Cases cited
Lotus and Delta v Culverwell; Barnard and Barnard v Walker; Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson
Hearing
25 November 2022

Similar decisions

All decisions in London Borough of Camden · Shops nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.