8 Pratt Mews, NW1 0AD
Studio and premises Decided 25 September 2025 CHG100887823 JMA Chartered Surveyors
Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure.
What was argued and what the tribunal found
The appellant, represented by a surveyor, challenged the rateable value of ground floor studio and office premises, arguing for a reduction from £37,000 RV based on comparable assessment evidence showing a tone of £210/m² for similar Victorian industrial conversions in the locality. The tribunal accepted the appellant's evidence that comparable assessment properties (particularly 12/13 Pratt Street and 15 Kings Terrace) demonstrated a rate of £210/m² was more reasonable than the original £400/m², but rejected the appellant's argument that the studio space should receive a 0.5 relativity reduction due to lack of natural light, finding it remained suitable for studio use. The appeal was allowed-in-part with the RV reduced to £17,750.
Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Chris Turner Photo, represented.
Grounds argued
- Comparable assessments (tone)
- Floor area or measurement
- Evidence
- Rents, Settled assessments, Photographs
- Cases cited
- Lotus & Delta v Culverwell
- Hearing
- 29 August 2025
Similar decisions
- BST & GND F(S) 247, CAMDEN HIGH STREET,, NW1 7BU — Dismissed, 10 Oct 2025
- BST & GRD FLR 243, CAMDEN HIGH STREET,, NW1 7BU — Dismissed, 10 Oct 2025
- Inc Pt Bst 18 Bst & Gnd F 16, High Holborn, WC1V 6BR — Allowed in part, 1 Oct 2025
- 151 -153, CAMDEN HIGH STREET, NW1 7JR — Dismissed, 10 Sept 2025
All decisions in London Borough of Camden · Shops nationally
Is your own rateable value in line?
A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.
Check a propertyThe tribunal’s decision in full
Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.