Free news & data alerts
Log in
Tribunals · London Borough of Islington · 2017 rating list

3RD FLR 53-54, ST JOHNS SQUARE, EC1V 4JL

Decided 24 October 2022 CHG100187956 Ryan

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV · 2017 list£55,500
Ratepayer sought£44,250
VO conceded first£52,500−5% before the hearing
Tribunal decided£47,000from 1 Apr 2017

Figures are as stated in the decision, and are values in the 2017 list; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This judgement decided 3 properties together; the figures above are for this appeal's property (3rd Floor 53-54 St Johns Square, London EC1V 4JL). Every property is listed below.

The 3 properties in this decision

One judgement covered all of these appeals. Each property’s figures as the judgement states them (2017 list); this appeal’s property is highlighted.

The properties covered by this tribunal decision, with the figures it states for each
PropertyOriginal RVSoughtTribunal decidedOutcome
1st Floor 53-54 St Johns Square, London EC1V 4JL£53,000£42,500£45,250Allowed in part
2nd Floor 53-54 St Johns Square, London EC1V 4JL£53,000£42,500£45,250Allowed in part
3rd Floor 53-54 St Johns Square, London EC1V 4JLThis appeal£55,500£44,250£47,000Allowed in part

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellants (Grimshaw Architects LLP and Frontera London Limited) argued that allowances of 4.75–5% to reflect temporary disturbance from adjacent redevelopment works at 96-100 Clerkenwell Road were insufficient. The tribunal found that the existing allowances were unreasonable, but rejected the appellants' request for an additional 15% allowance. Having regard to comparable allowances applied elsewhere in London (including 7.5% at 102-108 Clerkenwell Road and 14.2–15% at other properties), the tribunal determined that a total 15% allowance from the original compiled list assessment was reasonable, reflecting the severity and two-year duration of the works.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Grimshaw Architects LLP, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Building works or disturbance nearby
Change of circumstances
building works
Evidence
tone_of_list_comparables, Photographs, Settled assessments
Cases cited
Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson
Hearing
7 October 2022

Similar decisions

All decisions in London Borough of Islington · Offices nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.