Tribunals · City of Westminster · 2017 rating list

Fourth Floor, Grimaldi House, SW1Y 4JH

Offices and premises Decided 20 June 2022 CHG100189427 Conneely Tribe - Austin Marshall

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV£55,500
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£39,000from 5 Dec 2017

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 9 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant (company) challenged nine office floor assessments at Grimaldi House on the basis of material change of circumstances caused by multiple construction works in the locality, including the Conway Materials Compound, works at 24-25 St James's Square, demolition at 30 St James's Square, and planned works at Norfolk House. The appellant proposed a 37.5% reduction whilst the VO had allowed 20%. The tribunal found that the multiple construction works, particularly those at adjacent properties, would significantly impact a hypothetical tenant's rental bid and allowed the appeals in part with a 30% reduction effective from 5 December 2017, finding the evidence supported a higher allowance than 20% but did not support the full 37.5% sought.

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Grimaldi Agencies UK Limited, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Change of circumstances · decisive
Change of circumstances
construction works in locality
Evidence
Photographs, Expert report
Cases cited
Hostsoho Limited v David Jackson (VO) [2019] UKUT 0166; Berrill v Hill RA/34/99; Dawkins (VO) v Ash Brothers and Heaton Ltd [1969] 2 AC 336; Gardiner & Theobald LLP v David Jackson (VO) [2018] UKUT 0253 (LC)
Hearing
24 May 2022

Similar decisions

All decisions in City of Westminster · Offices nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.