Tribunals · City of Westminster · 2017 rating list

First Floor, Grimaldi House, SW1Y 4JH

Offices and premises Decided 20 June 2022 CHG100189496 Conneely Tribe - Austin Marshall

OutcomeAllowed in partThe tribunal reduced the rateable value, but by less than the ratepayer sought.
Original RV£55,500
Ratepayer sought—
VO conceded first—
Tribunal decided£39,000from 5 Dec 2017

Figures are as stated in the decision; a dash means the document does not state that figure. This decision covers 9 properties; the figures shown are for the first listed.

What was argued and what the tribunal found

The appellant contended that nine office assessments in Grimaldi House had been adversely affected by multiple material changes in circumstances relating to major construction works in the locality, including the Conway compound, reconstruction at 24-25 St James's Square, demolition/reconstruction at 30 St James's Square (party wall), and planned extensive works at Norfolk House. The appellant sought a 37.5% allowance; the VO allowed 20%. The tribunal found that the construction works, particularly those at 30 St James's Square (immediately adjacent/party wall) and 24-25 St James's Square, were severe in duration and intensity, and that the hypothetical tenant would have considered future Norfolk House works. However, the tribunal found the 37.5% allowance was not fully supported by evidence. The tribunal allowed the appeals in part, awarding a 30% allowance across all nine properties, applying the precedent from Hostsoho Limited v David Jackson (which awarded 25% for two sets of works).

Summary generated from the decision text and checked against it. The appellant was Grimaldi Agencies UK Limited, represented.

Grounds argued

  • Change of circumstances · decisive
Change of circumstances
construction works in the locality
Evidence
Expert report, Photographs
Cases cited
First – Fourth Floors, 8 Berwick Street (Hostsoho Limited v David Jackson (VO) [2019] UKUT 0166); Berrill v Hill RA/34/99; Dawkins (VO) v Ash Brothers and Heaton Limited [1969] 2 AC 336
Hearing
24 May 2022

Similar decisions

All decisions in City of Westminster · Offices nationally

Is your own rateable value in line?

A free check compares a property with the assessments around it and says plainly whether there is anything worth pursuing.

Check a property

The tribunal’s decision in full

Download the PDF · Find it on valuationtribunal.gov.uk

Decision © Crown copyright, published by the Valuation Tribunal Service under the Open Government Licence v3.0 and reproduced unaltered. This site does not index the names of private individuals that appear in decisions. Information, not advice.